Random good picture Not show

1. The appellant did not give evidence.

2. The appellant was convicted of wounding with intent.

3. The appellant's wife was acquitted of aiding and abetting the appellant on count 4 and discharged.

4. The defendant did not commence proceedings against the appellant until 7 March 1988.

5. The appellant, Norman Mattison, was charged with committing an act of gross indecency with his co-defendant.

6. The appellant was concerned in a conspiracy to defraud the clearing banks of ￡60,000.

6. Sentencedict.com try its best to gather and create good sentences.

7. The appellant was found in possession of 1.03 grammes of heroin.

8. Special considerations: there was no indication that the appellant was suffering from psychiatric disorder.

9. In each case the appellant has been found guilty of contempt of court and has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment.

10. The appellant had not been required to surrender to the Central Criminal Court and the question of granting bail did not arise.

11. The appellant had used offensive language to a 12 year old girl who had run home and complained to her father.

12. The appellant was detained by a booking clerk who saw him putting the coins into the machine.

13. If the appeal is upheld the appellant will be consulted on any statement to be published.

14. The appellant was babysitting for a number of young children and committed buggery on a girl aged three.

15. However, it was clear that the appellant did qualify for a custodial sentence under Criminal Justice Act 1982.

16. The appellant was charged with and convicted of the theft of the ￡6.

17. The administrative appellant, intervenor appellant, or administrative appeal representative may file an application for view, cite or copy for such evidence materials stipulated in last Paragraph.

18. The people's court of second instance may resolve appellant cases through mediation.

19. The administrative appellant, intervenor appellant, or administrative appeal representative states the issue of fact and the issue of law.

20. After retiring the jury returned with a notice asking whether the co-defendant was charged with gross indecency with the appellant only.

21. In this case it was not contended that the appellant had not acted dishonestly.

22. There was evidentially speaking a head-on collision between the appellant and the principal prosecution witness.

23. A group of three men including, he said, the appellant, were being rowdy.

24. In such circumstances we reject the contentions advanced on behalf of the appellant on this first ground of appeal.

25. On 29 July 1988, at the Romford County Court, the public examination of the appellant took place.

26. After a trial lasting seven days and presided over by Judge Rucker, the jury convicted the appellant of the four counts.

27. On this appeal, we have had the assistance of leading counsel for both the appellant and the Crown.

28. The co-defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of committing an act of gross indecency with the appellant.

29. In the absence of the jury, counsel for the appellant submitted that the documents were inadmissible in the criminal proceedings.

30. That situation was avoided in the present case, because the appellant chose not to give evidence for the reason already stated.